When examining writings from
authors of a certain genre, there is sometime an overlap in their use of
conventions, and as a result, many of the articles come off as being somewhat
similar. Each writer has a certain set of moves that differentiates their writings
from someone else’s. These moves can be seen by looking at a text more in depth
and by understanding the moves of an author it helps the reader to better
understand what they are reading. While writer’s moves can help set them apart
from other writers, the moves of authors help to link articles together. Karen
Rosenberg’s Reading Games: Strategies for Reading Scholarly Sources and Mike Bunn’s How to Read Like a Writer are very similar in many facets. While there is much
in common between these two articles, the moves of the authors in their
writing’s set the two articles apart.
Each essays opens up with a
personal flashback of their college days. Both of these flashbacks help the
reader to get familiar with the writer. By using a personal story at the
beginning of the article, Rosenberg and Bunn help to establish a relationship
with the reader and help any student relate to the struggles that they faced.
These introductions help to hook the reader’s attention. Without them, the
articles would be very bland and boring. Both articles set the scene of where
they were and this helps the reader to really envision and feel like they are
there with the writer. The use of “I” in each article makes it very personal.
These articles were made very interesting because as a student you can directly
sympathize with what both of the authors went through. The author’s moves in
the two articles help to make the articles more interesting and easier to read.
In Rosenberg’s Reading Games she uses bold headings in order to break up the text.
I think that this is useful because it helps to provide an overview of what the
author intends to talk about in that certain section. I like this move by the
author and it really helps me to understand what I am reading better. Later in
the writings, the author just bolds words that she thinks are important. I
don’t totally agree with this move because it seems somewhat randomized and
there is not really any parallelism to it. Rosenberg keeps the whole article
very personalized which makes the reader feel comfortable reading and also
makes them want to keep reading. The article as a whole really dissects the
daunting task of reading a scholarly article and puts it into a different light
that makes the reader say, “hey this is not so bad after all!” Overall
Rosenberg’s moves are very helpful in the sense that it helps to make the
reading easier and more enjoyable.
In Bunn’s How to Read like a
Writer, one of the moves that he uses it to
begin every section with a question. Like Rosenberg, this is a successful move
because it helps to break up the lengthy article, that with out these section
breaks, could be very long and dry. Besides the large section breaks, Bunn uses
bullet points in order to have the reader take a minute to stop and think about
what they just read. These bullet points, unlike the bolded text in the
previous article, these bullet points are very helpful in making the reading
more enjoyable. The article as a whole is very helpful and provides many good
tips and tricks on how to “read like a writer”.
Articles that are part of the same
genre, tend to somewhat get muddled together and seem to sometimes repeat
information. A writer’s moves help to put their “stamp” on their writings and
make it different from the rest. By examining an article more in depth, a
writer’s moves come out and by finding these moves; readers can use these
points to make the readings easier to understand. Other writers use other
authors’ moves and take them as examples and use these to improve their own writings.
In both Rosenberg’s and Bunn’s articles, their moves help to make their
articles more interesting and enjoyable to read. By making the beginning of
their papers more personalized, the reader has a easier time relating to what
the author went through. Each article helps college students better understand
writing as a whole.
ReplyDeleteAlden! You had great analysis. It seems that many genres or articles can be seen as being so similar, yet there are a few differences which separate them; I agree with you on that one. Also, personal stories I clearly see them as a way that connects the reader and the author. The connection between them is most effective at the beginning. All the evidence you provided from each article helped prove many of your points. Overall, great emphasis on the most important moves of each author. You seemed to grasp and answer the prompt in the best of ways.